How to learn the difference between agricultural technology and digital agriculture

The distinction between agriculture and technology is as old as agriculture itself, as demonstrated by the fact that the word “agriculturism” is actually spelled the same as “technology” and that the difference in both terms is often used interchangeably.

The key difference, however, is that agriculture and tech are fundamentally different in their use of the same technologies.

Both agriculture and the tech industry rely on the same crop-raising technology—plants—to provide food and feed to humans.

That technology is based on crop rotation and, thus, involves a large number of chemicals, fertilizers, and pesticides.

And both of these technologies are based on the assumption that plants will produce enough food to feed themselves over a long period of time, and both require the use of a high-energy-density, nutrient-rich, water-intensive farming system.

In other words, both technologies depend on the cultivation of certain crops.

In contrast, agtech, the field of agricultural technology, uses a variety of different technologies to achieve similar results, but does so in a different manner.

In this way, agtechnologies promise to be both more efficient and more sustainable, but also offer a new way to think about the agricultural sector.

For example, some agtech companies like AgTech Inc. are developing technologies that use the technology of soil sensors to determine the location of a plant’s roots and then grow the crops that they will need to feed the plant.

In many cases, the agtech technology will be cheaper to produce and consume than the traditional crop-based technology, so it is a boon for the farmer.

However, agTech also is looking at ways to better monitor the health of the crops, and thus, feed them better, by using a variety (such as genetically modified crops) that contain specific nutrients to help the plant absorb them and keep them alive longer.

And some ag tech companies are using technology like DNA sequencing to track the genetics of plants to make better fertilizer and feed.

In fact, some of the most innovative agtech technologies that have been developed in the last few years include genetic engineering (which uses technology to create new genes for plants), genetic sequencing, and genetic modification.

The technology that has the most potential to benefit the farmer is genetic engineering.

By introducing a gene into a plant, scientists can create a gene that can be passed on from generation to generation.

For some farmers, this technology is the future of farming.

In the future, it could provide a means of creating more food for all the world’s people, without relying on agriculture to provide it.

In a way, genetic engineering is a way to make agriculture more efficient.

However and because genetic engineering has not been perfected, it does not have the same environmental benefits of conventional farming.

As the world population increases, the demand for food will increase and farmers will need more land to grow their crops.

This is particularly true for rural areas where food insecurity is an issue.

In addition, there are environmental and ethical concerns with genetic engineering and there are fears that it could lead to the introduction of genetic modification, which could be used to improve crop traits, thus affecting food security and the environment in the future.

But genetic engineering can also help to address some of these problems.

By using technology to modify a plant that has already been grown in the lab, scientists could make a crop more efficient, more nutritious, and more resistant to certain diseases and pests.

This process can take a few years, but it will also allow farmers to reduce the amount of fertilizer they need, and they will be able to save money on the cost of planting the crops.

And it will help farmers to increase yields by increasing the amount and diversity of their crops, making it easier to grow more food.

There are many benefits to genetic engineering that farmers will benefit from.


it will take some time to make the technology more available to farmers and, therefore, less expensive to produce.

And this, in turn, will mean that farmers are less likely to invest in their farming technology.

The biggest hurdle in this area is cost.

It will take a long time to perfect genetic engineering, and then it will require a lot of money.

In recent years, some companies have been developing genetic engineering technologies, including genetic modification and gene editing.

And these technologies will be available to consumers and farmers, but they are not yet commercially available.

While these technologies can be beneficial for farmers, they also could have a negative impact on the environment and farmers’ livelihoods.

So, it will be important for agricultural research and development organizations like the European Union (EU) to support this new and growing field of agtech.

While genetic engineering might be the future for agriculture, it is not yet ready for consumer use.

The development of the new technology is a critical step to making genetic engineering a reality in the marketplace.

For now, however and until there is a market

Thailand agriculture technology challenges

Agriculture technology has been around for years.

But the country is still struggling to build a modern food system that delivers on the promise of the globalised world.

Agriculture technology is a key ingredient to the future of this country.

The challenges of modernising a country that is largely reliant on agribusiness and exporting food to the world have created a need for the country to build up its own agricultural technologies, said Dongpaak Chiang, a researcher at the Institute of Food, Agriculture and Agriculture Development, a think-tank.

“In the future, we will have to adapt to new technologies,” he told Al Jazeera.

Dongpak Chiamkham, the research director of the institute, said the challenges facing Thailand’s agricultural technology were unique and the country needed to adapt.

“The challenge of modernisation is that it’s a new challenge and it’s not a challenge that has been experienced in the past,” he said.

“We have to think about the new challenges in a different way.”

Chiang said the country had built up an industry that is a major source of jobs and income, but that its current agricultural technologies needed to be developed to meet the challenges of the future.

“This industry has to develop the best technology possible, which is to produce high quality products and products that can be transported,” he explained.

Dungpak told Aljazeera that it was hard to see how the country could develop its own food technology, as the country was dependent on imported food.

“Our food technology industry needs to be able to export to the international market,” he added.

“So, we have to find ways to import more products from abroad and this will create a bottleneck in the country.”

Dungpaak said the government needed to develop a strong food-processing industry.

“One of the things we need to do is to develop new processes, new technology, and also to develop different agricultural products that will make food easier for the people,” he continued.

The government’s focus on food and food-related industries is part of a strategy to modernise the country.

Dongsana, a popular city in Bangkok, is one of the main hubs of food-based industry.

The city was the first in the world to be awarded a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2016.

The UNESCO World Cultural Centre is a cultural hub in the centre of the city.

In the past, it was one of Asia’s most important centres for trade and trade with neighbouring countries.

Food and food related industries are still a big part of the local economy, Dongsna said.

Agriculture and food processing were two of the largest industries in Dungpas food and tourism sector.

Donsana is home to a large number of hotels and restaurants, as well as a number of small-scale food shops.

The Dongsan City Development Foundation, which runs Dongsani Street, is an initiative of the Tourism Development Board of Thailand, which aims to improve the quality of life in the city by creating a more sustainable economy.

The organisation aims to create a more attractive, sustainable environment.

Dowsing is a popular sport in Dongsaniae, and many locals are involved in the sport.

According to Dongpaiks Food Development Foundation and the Dongsans Food and Tourism Development Foundation (DTSDGF), the number of Dowsers in Dongan has grown from 6,000 in 2015 to more than 40,000.

The group also aims to increase the number to 60,000 by 2022.

“Dowsers have always been involved in Donsan food, food-marketing and food distribution,” said Dongspamat Satchinawat, a professor at the University of Thailand’s department of economics and finance.

Dengpaak also said the city was a great place for farmers to invest. “

People in Dowser areas are not poor, they are middle class and it is important to improve their quality of lives,” she added.

Dengpaak also said the city was a great place for farmers to invest.

“If you look at the farming area, Dongpas are not just farmers but also a lot of people in Dengpas farming area,” he pointed out.

“They are involved with the local industries.”

In the village of Dongsain, about a kilometre away from Dongsanyak, a young farmer, Chikchon, told Al-Jazeera that he would be more than happy to invest in a business if he was offered the chance.

“I think the chances are good for a business to grow,” he noted.

“But the biggest challenge for a farmer is the pollution.

We have to take care of our environment.”

Agriculture is also a major industry in rural areas of Thailand.

Agriculture is one part of Thailands food and trade sector.

Agriculture, or agriculture as it is also known